An image asking if infinite infinities are possible

‘Infinite Infinities’ is a crazy-sounding concept. Most people have issues wrapping their heads around the concept of infinity. Why are we then talking about an infinite number of infinities? Let me clarify. In my earlier article, Does Division By Zero Really Lead To Infinity?, I argued that we cannot treat zero just like any other number, especially when it comes to division.

If we treat zero just like any other number, firstly, 1/0 leads to infinity, and then, 2/0 also leads to infinity, and so on. This would imply that 1 = 2. Similarly, we could prove that any number is equal to every other number. All of this is, of course, absurd.

My point of travelling down this path was to show that 1/0 cannot be infinity. In the original article, I argued that division by zero leads to an ‘undefined’ result. But then, the following question arises: what if 1/0 leads to an infinity that is different from the one that arises from 2/0? This would lead to an infinite number of infinities.

Well, even considering the validity of that question, division by zero leads to other contradictions which makes it difficult to justify any conclusion other than an ‘undefined’ result. However, the concept of infinite infinities does not require division by zero. Infinite Infinities actually prevail! In order to understand what makes this possible, we need to start with the story that started it all.

This essay is supported by Generatebg

A product with a beautiful background featuring the sponsor: Generatebg - a service that generates high-resolution backgrounds in just one click. The description says "No more costly photographers" and displays a "Get Started" button beneath the description.

The Story of the Infinity and Anti-Infinity

Yes, you read that right! What could be anti-infinity? The story begins with the Greek Mathematician, Archimedes. In his famous letter to Eratosthenes, The Method of Mechanical Theorems, Archimedes defined a number x as infinite, if it satisfies the following condition-set: |x|>1, |x|>1+1, |x|>1+1+1,… (where |x| represents the absolute value of x).

He then went on to define anti-infinity as a number that is non-zero and if it satisfies the following condition-set: |x|<(1/1), |x|<(1/(1+1)), |x|<(1/(1+1+1)),…(where |x| again represents the absolute value of x).

Explaining infinite infinities: a portrait of archimedes who was the first recorded person to talk about infinities.
Portrait of Archimedes – Image from Wikimedia Commons

This concept of anti-infinity is necessary for the existence of infinity. It is analogous to shadows that come to existence because of light (when blocked by objects). Later on, the concept of anti-infinity came to be formally known as Infinitesimals. Throughout history, the concept of infinitesimals has played a strong role in calculating areas, among others. Before we move onto infinite infinities, it is useful if we look at the brief history of infinitesimals.

Infinitesimals Through History

Our story jumps forward in time by many centuries, and moves to Johannes Kepler, a key scientific figure from the 17th century. Kepler was a German astronomer, mathematician, philosopher, and music writer, among others. In short, he was a polymath.

He took a specific interest in planetary motion and wanted to calculate how planets move about in the sky. He eventually figured out that planetary orbits are elliptical in nature, which led him in pursuit of calculating elliptical areas. Back then, there was no formula available for the area of an ellipse, so he had to work around it. He tried to do this starting from the area of a circle and happened to further develop the practical application of infinitesimals. For ease of understanding, I’ll explain the concept using a simplified example.


Calculating Areas Using Infinitesimals

Consider a situation where you have a device that is capable of cutting tiles into rectangles and/or triangles of varying sizes. Using this device, and some raw tiles, you need to fill in the following floor space with tiles.

An image of a floor space that has a triangular top and a rectangular bottom. However, the left hand side of the triangle that connects to the rectangle seems to be curved a little bit. It is not a perfect triangle there.
Image created by the author

One way to do this would be to split the floor space as shown below, where the blue line indicates a split.

A blue line is introduced to split the triangle and rectangle from the floor space. A purple circle indicates that the triangle is curved in its left edge.
Image created by the author

However, do you notice the region circled in purple? That part of the floor space is a bit curved. And your tile-cutting device is only capable of producing rectangles and/or triangles. So how shall we proceed? How about introducing yet another section like this?

There are now two splits introduced. The rectangular split remains from before. The triangle is now split into two, one perfect triangle, and one imperfect triangle with the curved edge. However, because of the new split, the accuracy of the split has improved.
Image created by the author

It appears that we have now arrived at 3 sections: two triangles and one rectangle. That’s no problem, right? Hold your horses! There is one small detail that we have missed here. Let me clarify:

The imperfcte triangle is now highlighted from the former image. It appears that after we lay out the tiles, there is one small section of the floor space that is not filled by the tiles.
Image created by the author

Take a note of the small region that is left unfilled by the triangular tile. This is pretty much the problem that Kepler was facing. He was trying to calculate the area of non-regular geometries (an ellipse in his case) using areas of regular geometries (like circles, triangles, rectangles, etc.). In the end, he proposed that if one keeps dividing the geometry finer and finer, the approximation error would turn out to be negligible for practical purposes. He was practically doing something like this (except that he did it for an entire circle):

Explaining infinite infinities: A 2 dimensioanal Pizza wedge-like geometry of radius r is considered. It has 2 edges like a triangle would do, but the third edge is replaced by an arc. It is then evenly cut into 13 strips. Each strip has an arc length of delta. These strips are then neatly restructured into perfect triangles that form a triangle with height r and base 13*delta. Using this information, the area of the triangle is calculated as: 0.5*base*height = (13*delta*r)/2
Image created by the author

If you have come this far, you might be wondering what all this has to do with infinite infinities. Let’s get to that next.


The Precursor to Infinite Infinities

Kepler went a step further to show that if the number of divisions increases, the curve would be divided into smaller and smaller infinitesimal segments. And if the infinitesimal segment is small enough, the curve would become a straight line, and this would essentially eliminate the error. It is important to note that mathematically speaking, there is a world of difference between practically negligible error and eliminating the approximation error. Later on, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and Isaac Newton used a similar definition to invent calculus (each, individually). Even though this notion of infinitesimal was practically useful, many mathematicians did not buy it. They felt that the concept of infinitesimals was not rigorous and consistent with the mathematical rules of the time.

They faced the same problem (among others) that we saw at the beginning of the article. If we define an infinitesimal as ϵ, we end up with the following situation:

Explaining infinite infinities: Problems arise with infinitesimals when they are used to divide integers.
1/ϵ = infinity
2/ϵ = infinity
From these, we can conclude that
1/ϵ = 2/ϵ
This leads to the result that 1 = 2. which is, of course, absurd.
Math illustrated by the author

This led to huge controversial discussions, and the mathematicians ended up banning the concept of infinitesimals. It seemed like the concept of infinitesimals was practically useful, but not mathematically acceptable.

Infinite Infinities

Fast forward to today, not only has the concept of infinitesimals come back with a vengeance but has led to an entire branch of mathematics known as Nonstandard Analysis. Following the footsteps of Leibniz, 20th century mathematician Abraham Robinson led the charge in perfecting the mathematical definition of infinitesimals to be consistent and rigorous.

The result was that a new number system called the hyperreal number system was born. In this system, an infinite number of infinitesimals, and consequently, an infinite number of infinities coexist with real numbers. One of the notable features of the hyperreal number system is that it allows for mathematical operations to be performed on infinities and infinitesimals just like on real numbers.

Having said this, the story connecting Leibniz, Newton, and Robinson is way too good to compress into this article. I will cover that, and the 20th century mathematical treatment of infinitesimals in a follow-up article. For now, I’ll conclude by saying that the concept of infinite infinities and infinitesimals do really exist and have proved their right to exist in the mathematical world.


I hope you found this article interesting and useful. If you’d like to get notified when interesting content gets published here, consider subscribing.

Further reading that might interest you: What Exactly Is Zero Raised To The Power Zero? and How Many Decimal Digits Of Pi Do We Really Need?

Street Science

Explore humanity's most curious questions!

Sign up to receive more of our awesome content in your inbox!

Select your update frequency:

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.