The raven paradox knocks at the door of one of the most fundamental aspects of science. At its core, it stems from the following question:
“What is evidence?”
Logician and philosopher Carl Gustav Hempel formulated a playful-sounding logic puzzle in the 1940s to demonstrate how this paradox occurs. He starts with the following statement:
“All ravens are black.”
This statement is also where the paradox’s name comes from. Following this, let us say that you are tasked with figuring out whether this statement is true or not.
On your adventure, you encounter a black raven first. You would intuitively consider this as evidence confirming the original statement. Since it is just one instance of ‘a’ black raven, it is not outright proof of the original statement, but just a piece of evidence that confirms the statement.
Next, you encounter a green apple. Would you consider this as evidence in favour of or against the original statement? Intuitively, you are likely to treat this piece of information as irrelevant to the topic at hand. But what if I told you that this is indeed evidence in favour of the original statement?
Illustration created by the author
It sounds counter-intuitive and false. Well, this is the challenge that the raven paradox presents us with.
The bigger question that we are trying to answer here is:
“Can we come up with a logical system that assesses evidence in favour or against any given statement?”
In this essay, I will be breaking down how the paradox occurs using an intuitive approach that puts three major puzzle pieces together. We will be avoiding complex formal expressions to make our lives as easy as possible.
To begin understanding the challenge better, we will need to cover the four fundamental concepts listed below first. But before you proceed, just know that these are just a bunch of fancy-sounding words that describe simple concepts of how human beings think.
1. The concept of confirmation.
2. Instance confirmation
3. The equivalence condition.
4. The contrapositive statement.
Again, don’t let the fancy-sounding words intimidate you. I assure you that they are simple concepts. Let us start with confirmation.
The Concept of Confirmation
To be frank with you, we have already covered the concept of confirmation in this essay. It just happens to be so that I haven’t explicitly defined it.
Consider the analogy of a detective story. Let us say that the detective is tasked with solving a crime. She discovers that the butler was at the crime scene on the day the crime happened.
The detective considers this as evidence to the hypothesis (not proof!) that the butler committed the crime. This is what we define as confirmation. If the statement were “The butler committed the crime.”, the fact that he was at the crime scene on the crime day is considered as confirmation of the hypothesis.
Later on, it becomes apparent that the butler was not at the crime scene at the exact time of the crime. The detective considers this as evidence against the statement that the butler committed the crime. This is what we define as disconfirmation.
Apart from this, the detective learns that there was a sandstorm on Mars at the same time as the crime. The detective considers this statement as irrelevant for her case. This is what we define as a neutral statement. It is neither confirmation nor disconfirmation of the hypothesis statement.
Now that we have covered the concept of confirmation, let us move on to instance confirmation.
Instance Confirmation
Tounderstand instance confirmation, let us go back to the original statement:
“All ravens are black.”
This is what we would call a general hypothesis. The notion of instance confirmation says that if we encounter a single instance of the general hypothesis, it counts to some degree as evidence confirming the general hypothesis.
In the case of our original statement, the fact that you encountered a black raven would count as evidence to some degree confirming the general hypothesis that all ravens are black.
Right, that’s all there is to instance confirmation. Let us now move on to the equivalence condition.
The Equivalence Condition
Let us say that we have two statements that logically convey precisely the same meaning, even if they use different wording/grammatical structures. This pair of statements is what we would define as equivalent statements.
Let us consider the following example:
Statement A: Frozen water is completely made of ice.
Statement B: Ice is what frozen water is completely made of.
Even though these two statements use different kinds of sentence structures, they convey the same meaning. Consequently, they are equivalent statements.
The equivalence condition states that any two equivalent statements are either both true or both false. There cannot come a situation where one of them is true and the other is not. Such a situation in logic is what is known as a contradiction.
Right, so far, so good. Onward to the next piece of the puzzle we go.
The Contrapositive Statement
Remember that I told you that all of these concepts are simple. Well, I lied; I apologise! The contrapositive statement is probably the only concept that is slightly advanced.
We almost never use it in real life (explicitly). It is a concept that is reserved for scientific usage in mathematics, logic, and philosophy.
The contrapositive statement is a way of expressing logical equivalence that uses negation. It is probably far easier to directly look at an example. Consider the following two statements.
Statement A: If it is raining, then the grass is wet.
Statement B: If the grass is not wet, then it is not raining.
Statement B sounds starkly different to statement A, but in the language of logic, both these statements are saying exactly the same thing!
In a general sense, the contrapositive statement takes the following form:
Image created by the author
Years ago, when I first encountered this concept as part of discrete mathematics, it took me quite a while to really understand and digest this concept. So, don’t be alarmed if this is confusing for you. It is okay to be confused.
At the same time, it is very important that you understand how the contrapositive statement works. Without this key piece of the puzzle, the raven paradox will likely remain out of reach. So, please take your time to grasp the contrapositive statement before you proceed with reading this essay.
If it is any motivation, understanding the contrapositive principle will help you a great deal in weeding out fake news statements and other misinformation cases in real life. It would strengthen your sense of logic.
Right, if you have grasped the notion of the contrapositive statement, we are finally ready to deal with the main challenge.
The Raven Paradox — Revealed
We are now going to use every piece of the puzzle we have picked up until this point to understand the raven paradox. Let us again consider the original statement. But this time, let’s try to formulate its contrapositive:
Image created by the author
The contrapositive statement appears to be a really bad way of writing the original statement. But given that these two statements convey the same meaning, they are equivalent statements.
Now, let us consider the scenario where you encounter a green apple. If you consider the original statement, this encounter appears intuitively irrelevant. But if you consider the contrapositive of the original statement, the encounter of a green apple serves as evidence in favour of the original hypothesis (that all ravens are black).
The green apple is a non-black entity and it is a non-raven. The logic checks out. Here is a summary of what we just did:
1. We first formulated our original statement in its contrapositive form.
2. We then established that the original statement and its contrapositive form are equivalent statements.
3. By looking at an entity that has nothing to do with ravens (in the form of a green apple), we were able to make an ‘instance confirmation’ of the contrapositive statement.
4. Since the contrapositive statement and the original statement are equivalent, the green apple provides ‘instance confirmation’ (evidence) of the original statement.
In short, we could confirm a hypothesis about ravens simply by looking at a green apple or a blue car, etc. This sounds intuitively absurd. But it makes logical sense. This reveals a contradiction between inductive logic and intuition — the raven paradox!
Final Thoughts
Inthe end, we used logically consistent ingredients in the form of ‘instance confirmation’, the equivalence condition, and the contrapositive statement to arrive at a logically inconsistent conclusion.
To make sense of this paradox, we need to make one of the following choices:
1. One of the following three concepts isfalse: instance confirmation, the equivalence condition, or the contrapositive statement.
2. The conclusion cannot follow the logically consistent ingredients we put together.
3. The conclusion must be true, even though it intuitively appears to be false.
My question to you: How would you proceed? While you ponder upon the meaning and implications of this paradox, rest assured that you are not alone.
The scientific community and deep thinkers alike have been trying to crack this challenge for decades now. In a follow-up essay, I will cover how one could approach tackling the raven paradox!
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement
1 year
Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category .
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
CookieLawInfoConsent
1 year
Records the default button state of the corresponding category & the status of CCPA. It works only in coordination with the primary cookie.
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Cookie
Duration
Description
_gat
1 minute
This cookie is installed by Google Universal Analytics to restrain request rate and thus limit the collection of data on high traffic sites.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Cookie
Duration
Description
__gads
1 year 24 days
The __gads cookie, set by Google, is stored under DoubleClick domain and tracks the number of times users see an advert, measures the success of the campaign and calculates its revenue. This cookie can only be read from the domain they are set on and will not track any data while browsing through other sites.
_ga
2 years
The _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors.
_ga_R5WSNS3HKS
2 years
This cookie is installed by Google Analytics.
_gat_gtag_UA_131795354_1
1 minute
Set by Google to distinguish users.
_gid
1 day
Installed by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously.
CONSENT
2 years
YouTube sets this cookie via embedded youtube-videos and registers anonymous statistical data.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Cookie
Duration
Description
IDE
1 year 24 days
Google DoubleClick IDE cookies are used to store information about how the user uses the website to present them with relevant ads and according to the user profile.
test_cookie
15 minutes
The test_cookie is set by doubleclick.net and is used to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE
5 months 27 days
A cookie set by YouTube to measure bandwidth that determines whether the user gets the new or old player interface.
YSC
session
YSC cookie is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos on Youtube pages.
yt-remote-connected-devices
never
YouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
yt-remote-device-id
never
YouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
Comments